About Me

Name:mrsbooks
Email: wendytutor@dejazzd.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Blog Roll

 

A Response to Gloria Steinem

This is my response to Gloria Steinem's inane column on the LA Times, http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-oe-steinem4-2008sep04,0,1290251.story:
 
Gloria Steinem, you don't know what you're talking about. You're the misogynst, if there ever was one. And a hypocrite too. You're just jealous it wasn't Hillary Clinton. And you feminist gals will never learn. You can't attract voters, both male and female, if you're spouting hate, which you dinosaurettes do on a regular basis. Hillary's shrill screeching reminded me of my mother, and I wouldn't have voted for Clinton, if she was the ONLY choice.

You're jealous, too, because you know that Sarah Palin's the real deal. Plus, how much research have you done on hunting, ANWR, or anything else? You're just spitting your vitriol once again. Get with the program--you're out of touch with today's women, who were damaged because your ilk influenced our mothers!  Think again, Ms. Steinem, today's women don't care what you think, and we're proving that with our votes!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Texas group sues to keep teacher background checks private

Yikes! On June 23, 2008, the Houston Chronicle reported that "A teacher's group filed a lawsuit ... in an effort to prevent the release to the media of personal information gleaned from teacher background checks." The lede is enough to scare the pants off of parents who send their kids to the Texas public school system. The immediate questions that comes to mind are, "What do these teachers have to hide that came out in their background checks? And would I want these teachers instructing or being alone with my children?"  The answers would be I want to know what's in these reports, and I wouldn't want my kids to be alone with those teachers that had shady backgrounds.
 
Thank goodness I live in Pennsylvania. But Pennsylvania parents aren't safe either. Ten years ago, there were reports that teachers, who were fired for misconduct with public school children, were the same teachers moving to another county and getting teaching jobs at a different school districts within the state.
 
So what should parents do? I suggest that parents form groups to fight teachers' unions and other teacher organizations that prohibit their background checks to be made public. As I've said before, public school teachers are paid by the taxpayers of their state, and we deserve to know what they've done that could potentially harm our children because we're ultimately responsible for our children's well-being and safety. If these teachers don't like it, well, I guess they should've thought about that before they did whatever they did in private to harm their reputations. Otherwise, it's time for them to find another vocation that won't harm another child.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

David McCullough Weighs in on History in Danger

 One of my favorite authors is David McCullough. His thorough research and passion for American history has sparked me to learn more about this great country. He remarks in Parade, June 22, 2008, that U.S. history is in danger because "For at least 25 years, we've been raising young Americans, who are, by and large, historically illerate. History has not just been pushed to the back burner, it's been pushed off the stove." Yikes, that quote refers to my generation too. I graduated in 1987. So I'm a part of a generation that wasn't taught good American history.
 
And I can attest to that. I vaguely remember in 9th grade U.S. history that my teacher tried to make it interesting to us. But he really didn't take it beyond the textbook. He had passion for American history, but he had a difficult time translated that to hormonal 15-year olds. And, truth be told, at that time, I didn't care either. But my dad could make history come alive.
 
My dad would talk about current events with the locals who ate at his restaurant. He'd discuss history and politics. He made history interesting. My mother also loved history, although she'd rather speak about Shakespeare, King Henry VIII, and Queen Elizabeth. But these discussions and passions that my parents' had were seeds that dropped on me as an adult.
 
Finally, my grandfather explained what patriotism was. It was 1976, and my family and I were participating in Revolutionary War reenactments. It was fun, and I learned a lot. My grandfather's favorite presidents were George Washington and Abraham Lincoln. He explained who they were and why they were his favorite presidents. 
 
What can be done now? Again, I always go back to the parents, but in the U.S., you do have more control over your children's education than you think you have. Instead of a week lounging at Disney World or at the beach, go take day vacations to your local city and state seats of government. Read (or listen to audiobooks) books on American history from historians like David McCullough and Doris Kearns Goodwin. Study and then translate this history to your children as you ride in a car or sit around the dinner table. Before visiting places, research them by going online with your kids and researching the old fashioned way, at the library.
 
Finally, check out what's being taught in school. You have a right to review your children's textbooks. Do that. Make sure that they're learning real history, not revisionist drivel. Sit down with your children and go through the history books together. Read the captions and sidebars. Look up historical figures during the time period that your kids are studying in school and add that for discussion at the dinner table. You make history come alive, and your kids will absorb it with you. Try it!
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

David McCullough Weighs in on History in Danger

 One of my favorite authors is David McCullough. His thorough research and passion for American history has sparked me to learn more about this great country. He remarks in Parade, June 22, 2008, that U.S. history is in danger because "For at least 25 years, we've been raising young Americans, who are, by and large, historically illerate. History has not just been pushed to the back burner, it's been pushed off the stove." Yikes, that quote refers to my generation too. I graduated in 1987. So I'm a part of a generation that wasn't taught good American history.
 
And I can attest to that. I vaguely remember in 9th grade U.S. history that my teacher tried to make it interesting to us. But he really didn't take it beyond the textbook. He had passion for American history, but he had a difficult time translated that to hormonal 15-year olds. And, truth be told, at that time, I didn't care either. But my dad could make history come alive.
 
My dad would talk about current events with the locals who ate at his restaurant. He'd discuss history and politics. He made history interesting. My mother also loved history, although she'd rather speak about Shakespeare, King Henry VIII, and Queen Elizabeth. But these discussions and passions that my parents' had were seeds that dropped on me as an adult.
 
Finally, my grandfather explained what patriotism was. It was 1976, and my family and I were participating in Revolutionary War reenactments. It was fun, and I learned a lot. My grandfather's favorite presidents were George Washington and Abraham Lincoln. He explained who they were and why they were his favorite presidents. 
 
What can be done now? Again, I always go back to the parents, but in the U.S., you do have more control over your children's education than you think you have. Instead of a week lounging at Disney World or at the beach, go take day vacations to your local city and state seats of government. Read (or listen to audiobooks) books on American history from historians like David McCullough and Doris Kearns Goodwin. Study and then translate this history to your children as you ride in a car or sit around the dinner table. Before visiting places, research them by going online with your kids and researching the old fashioned way, at the library.
 
Finally, check out what's being taught in school. You have a right to review your children's textbooks. Do that. Make sure that they're learning real history, not revisionist drivel. Sit down with your children and go through the history books together. Read the captions and sidebars. Look up historical figures during the time period that your kids are studying in school and add that for discussion at the dinner table. You make history come alive, and your kids will absorb it with you. Try it!
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Parental involvement in education will see gains in test scores

I recently read an interesting article afrom the Washington Post by Maria Glod entitled, "Mandated Tutoring Not Helping Maryland, Virginia Scores." The focus of the article centers around how tutoring is not helping students with test scores in math and reading. While I agree with some parts of the article, such as some students may be so far behind that it's not reflected in their test scores, it goes back to folks again relying on the government to get them out of trouble. Overall, I don't have a problem with Bush's "Leave No Child Behind," except in areas where Kindergartners and first graders are coming home with an exorbinant amount of homework. Yet, I don't believe giving families free tutoring after school will help the problem. And here's why.
 
I was a tutor for close to 15 years. I met all kinds of families, and even participated in a government-funded program that reimbursed parents for tutoring by me. The kids whose grades improved were always the ones whose parents supported my efforts at helping their kids and followed up on any remedial help that I gave them to do at home. The parents who ignored my ideas or didn't support me often had kids who continued to do poorly at school.
 
So, when I read an article like this one, I still place the responsibility on the parents' shoulders--they are ultimately responsible for their children's success in school. Homeschooling's a case in point where those students are often way ahead of the curve in test scores. And, it's because of their parents' vast involvement and investment in their education.
 
I can hear some social justice folks saying, "Well, what about the poor single mom, whose working three jobs, just to put food on the table?" Well, while I sympathize with the stress-load of these people,I have two counter points to make against that argument. First, look at Dr. Ben Carson's story. His mom, who was undereducated, illiterate, and worked two to three jobs to keep her family going, still maintained that her sons had to read a book a week and give a written report on what they read after they started on a deep slide toward failure. Dr. Carson credits his illiterate mother's involvement in his teen years to his successful career today as a neurosurgeon at Johns Hopkins University. Second, I encourage these moms, dads, grandmothers, and aunts to teach the next generation to do things in the right order: get married, have children, and stay married to the same person. Dr. Walter Williams says that this is a surefire way to stay out of poverty. And I add on to allow more time for parents to stay involved in their kids' education.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Public School Dilemma

It's a shame that public schools have gone toward liberal ideology and teaching, just like other government-run arenas in the U.S. I find it frustrating as a parent that without school vouchers, my choices of where to educate my children are limited to homeschooling or public education. Since I'm not a parent willing to have my kids home all day needing direction and teaching, my husband and I unfortunately opted for public ed. We're blessed because our local elementary school is rather conservative.
 
But I worry about sending my children off to the intermediate school, middle school, or high school. Granted, my husband and I have a few years to go before that decision needs to be made. Yet, at this time, it's obvious that the upper levels of my local school district are losing control. From a middle school fiasco to a principal making the decision to agree with the students that time should be taken out of the school day for remembering the unfortunates of our world--including persecution of the transgendered and homosexual--was essential, I think my local school board, parents, and community are losing sight of what it means for students to go to public school. Leftist ideologies are part of the norm, and parental rights/control are losing the battle.
 
Until my husband and I need to cross the bridge of secondary ed for our children, I've started an email campaign to all members of the school board. I feel strongly that they need to know that not everyone in my local community feels that it's right for principals to make controversial decisions to hold a school-wide moment of silence program that stands for promoting homosexual ideology; for middle school teachers to be negligent about what goes on in their classrooms; and for the general direction of where my local public school is going.
 
I don't want this American institution to be damned like a lot of the other public institutions in this land. It would be nice for parents to continue having choices for their children's educations without feeling that they aren't doing their best by sending their kids to the local public school.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sex in Schools: Why Parents Should be Concerned

Doug Giles' newest article called Memphis High School: Reading, Writing And Bumping nad Grinding, was about an isolated incident in Tennesee. Yet, I'm afraid that it might be a new trend for public schools. For example, in Lancaster County, Pa., there was  a incident, possibly sexual in nature (the Ephrata Area School District won't divulge what exactly happened), that happened in a middle school classroom. According to an Ephrata Reviewhttp://ephratareview.com) article dated on Wednesday, May 14, 2008, the Ephrata Area School District's school board is still maintaining its stance of not telling what happened in a middle school classroom in April 2008. The Ephrata Review states, "A nonviolent, consensual incident occurred between students in April in a middle school classroom. The teacher, who was in the classroom the entire time, was unawared at the time that it occurred. The incident was reported to the teacher at the beginning of hte next class period, and the teacher immendiately reported the matter to the Middle School Office."
 
Not a big deal, right? The problem comes in when the school district refuses to disclose what the "incident" actually was, leaving the community to wonder what happened in that classroom. The school board maintains that it wasn't neither drugs nor weapons. So what's the alternative? The school district and its board are hiding under state and federal statutes, like the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, citing that the law prohibits, "the disclosure of certain student educational records and personally identifiable information." Okay, I don't want to know who the kids were, but I do want to know what happened, and why did it happen in the first place.
 
Further on in the article, the author, Gary P. Klinger, noted, "The district acted immediately, beginning its investigation immediately, and the district called the parents in the class immediately. There was no cover up at all, neither by the teacher nor by any member of the administration. Further the school board was fully apprised of the situation, and members were advised by our legal counsel not to discuss the details of the situation with the public."
 
Well, maybe no cover up, per se, but still all parents should be notified as to what happened. We are paying taxes, and some of us, are sending our children to a school in that district. We don't need to know the grisly details. Just what happened; why did the kids feel free enough to do that; and what the heck was the teacher doing that he/she didn't notice what was going on?
 
Granted, I'm making a leap of judgement here, but since it wasn't drug or weapon-related, what else could it be? It burns me up that for parents like me, who want their children to get a descent education, but can't afford private school and don't want to homeschool, have no choice but to send them to these moral educational vacuums that we pay taxes for.
 
First it was kids shooting their classmates into oblivion. Now it's sex in school. What's next? I'm afraid to even contemplate that.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »